Dear Open Source Santa,
Now that you have Java in your open source toy bag, can I have Duck Typing please ? It shouldn’t be too hard to do, since the elves in Ruby-Wonder-Land have been making toys with Duck Typing for years. I’ve been a good boy all year and promise to play nicely with the .Net kids next door.
You don’t know what Duck Typing is? Sorry, I forgot that you’re more than 1000 years old. Little Jamie next door got Ruby last year and he says that ‘if it looks like a duck, and walks like a duck , then it is a duck’. He says making the computer do more work makes it a lot easier to write programs.
My Teacher says not to be greedy, and that you’re very busy making Toy Trains. She says just ask for getters and setters. You know, the boring code like ‘getSomeValue()’ and setSomeValue(). She says the Apache imps have been very good with Dynaforms but that writing a Java web application is still just too slow.
Rudolph will tell you that writing get(“someValue”) is about as cool as having a bright red nose. He would also want to put ‘someValue’ in one place only (the web page). Having to write config files and javabeans feels too much like homework.
Santa, I know there are other children that need changes to the core Java code more than I do, so maybe you know of an open source project that already has this.
P.S. :I still want to keep compile time type checking to make sure I don’t make any mistakes.
Hah! Hilarious! I like that post much.
I’d like to have one more toy from Santa bag. I mean, to have clousures in Java language or at least some nice syntax instead of full-fledge inner anonymous classes that scares junior developers I work with 😉